Prospect Median PriceThe House price is 2% higher than last year. Search Prospect sold pricesProspect Median RentThe House rent is 10% higher than last year.
| Blackfriars Priory School, Prospect | | Compare |
School Facts | School sector: | Non-government | School type: | Combined school | Gender: | Single Sex-Boy | Total student: | 993 (boy:993, girl:0) | Total staff: | 91 | Student attendance: | 100% | |
| None-english student: | 46% | |
| ICSEA value: | | ICSEA distribution: | Bottom quarter | Middle quarters | Top quarter | 23% | 21% | 40% | 16% |
| Website: | http://web.bps.sa.edu.au | Location: | Prospect | Address: | 17 Prospect Road Prospect, SA 5082 | Nearby: | House Price House Rent Public Transport | Phone: | 08 8269 6333 |
|
| More Photos |
School Comment | Blackfriars Priory School is a Catholic School, educating boys from Reception to year 12. The school is 57 years old, and currently there are 80 teaching staff and about 1050 students. It is located 5 km from the city. The 'Dominican Tradition', built up o... more |
Student Assessment | | Reading | Writing | Spelling | Grammar | Numeracy | Rank | Year 3 | 362 | 374 | 403 | 385 | 387 | 329 | Year 5 | 472 | 472 | 494 | 483 | 477 | 237 | Year 7 | 548 | 560 | 545 | 548 | 563 | 105 | Year 9 | 568 | 566 | 575 | 561 | 587 | 95 |
| Student assessment is based on he National Assessment Program - Literacy and Numeracy(NAPLAN) results in 2011. |
Reviews | By Parent - 02 Sep 2022, Rate: poor | The school should spend more money on better teachers than a new building | | By Parent - 14 May 2020, Rate: excellent | Is ok but it needs to become more progressive in tech if its to keep up with neighbouring schools. | | By Parent - 06 Dec 2019, Rate: poor | Despite some nurturing teachers, the school is held back by conservative, inflexible, autocratic leadership and governance. The school (and its students) would greatly benefit from embracing progressive notions of inclusion, managing problems in an open, consultative and courageous manner and in addressing gender gaps in leadership. | |
|
| |